JavaScript Code Splitting Advanced: Route-based vs. Component-based for Global Performance

The Imperative for Code Splitting in Modern Web Applications

In today's interconnected world, web applications are no longer confined to local networks or high-speed broadband regions. They serve a global audience, often accessing content via diverse devices, varying network conditions, and from geographical locations with distinct latency profiles. Delivering an exceptional user experience, irrespective of these variables, has become paramount. Slow loading times, especially the initial page load, can lead to high bounce rates, reduced user engagement, and directly impact business metrics such as conversions and revenue.

This is where JavaScript code splitting emerges not just as an optimization technique but as a fundamental strategy for modern web development. As applications grow in complexity, so does their JavaScript bundle size. Shipping a monolithic bundle containing all application code, including features a user may never access, is inefficient and detrimental to performance. Code splitting addresses this by breaking down the application into smaller, on-demand chunks, allowing browsers to download only what's immediately necessary.

Understanding JavaScript Code Splitting: The Core Principles

At its heart, code splitting is about improving the efficiency of resource loading. Instead of delivering a single, large JavaScript file containing your entire application, code splitting allows you to split your codebase into multiple bundles that can be loaded asynchronously. This significantly reduces the amount of code required for the initial page load, leading to a faster "Time to Interactive" and a smoother user experience.

The Core Principle: Lazy Loading

The fundamental concept behind code splitting is "lazy loading." This means deferring the loading of a resource until it's actually needed. For instance, if a user navigates to a specific page or interacts with a particular UI element, only then is the associated JavaScript code fetched. This contrasts with "eager loading," where all resources are loaded upfront, regardless of immediate necessity.

Lazy loading is particularly powerful for applications with many routes, complex dashboards, or features behind conditional rendering (e.g., admin panels, modals, rarely used configurations). By only fetching these segments when they're activated, we dramatically reduce the initial payload.

How Code Splitting Works: The Role of Bundlers

Code splitting is primarily facilitated by modern JavaScript bundlers like Webpack, Rollup, and Parcel. These tools analyze your application's dependency graph and identify points where the code can be safely split into separate chunks. The most common mechanism for defining these split points is through dynamic import() syntax, which is part of the ECMAScript proposal for dynamic module imports.

When a bundler encounters an import() statement, it treats the imported module as a separate entry point for a new bundle. This new bundle is then loaded asynchronously when the import() call is executed at runtime. The bundler also generates a manifest that maps these dynamic imports to their corresponding chunk files, allowing the runtime to fetch the correct resource.

For example, a simple dynamic import might look like this:

            // Before code splitting:
import LargeComponent from './LargeComponent';
function renderApp() {
  return <App largeComponent={LargeComponent} />;
}

// With code splitting:
function renderApp() {
  const LargeComponent = React.lazy(() => import('./LargeComponent'));
  return (
    <React.Suspense fallback={<div>Loading...</div>}>
      <App largeComponent={LargeComponent} />
    </React.Suspense>
  );
}

            

              
                Copy
              
            
          

In this React example, LargeComponent's code will only be fetched when it's first rendered. Similar mechanisms exist in Vue (async components) and Angular (lazy-loaded modules).

Why Advanced Code Splitting Matters for a Global Audience

For a global audience, the benefits of advanced code splitting are amplified:

• Latency Challenges in Diverse Geographies: Users in remote regions or those far from your server's origin will experience higher network latency. Smaller initial bundles mean fewer round trips and faster data transfer, mitigating the impact of these delays.
• Bandwidth Variations: Not all users have access to high-speed internet. Mobile users, especially in emerging markets, often rely on slower 3G or even 2G networks. Code splitting ensures that critical content loads quickly, even under constrained bandwidth conditions.
• Impact on User Engagement and Conversion Rates: A fast-loading website creates a positive first impression, reduces frustration, and keeps users engaged. Conversely, slow loading times are directly correlated with higher abandonment rates, which can be particularly costly for e-commerce sites or critical service portals operating globally.
• Resource Constraints on Diverse Devices: Users access the web from a myriad of devices, from powerful desktop machines to entry-level smartphones. Smaller JavaScript bundles require less processing power and memory on the client side, ensuring a smoother experience across the hardware spectrum.

Understanding these global dynamics underscores why a thoughtful, advanced approach to code splitting isn't just a "nice to have" but a critical component of building performant and inclusive web applications.

Route-based Code Splitting: The Navigation-Driven Approach

Route-based code splitting is perhaps the most common and often the simplest form of code splitting to implement, especially in Single Page Applications (SPAs). It involves splitting your application's JavaScript bundles based on the different routes or pages within your application.

Concept and Mechanism: Splitting Bundles Per Route

The core idea is that when a user navigates to a specific URL, only the JavaScript code required for that particular page is loaded. All other routes' code remains unloaded until the user explicitly navigates to them. This strategy assumes that users typically interact with one main view or page at a time.

Bundlers achieve this by creating a separate JavaScript chunk for each lazily loaded route. When the router detects a route change, it triggers the dynamic import() for the corresponding chunk, which then fetches the necessary code from the server.

Implementation Examples

React with React.lazy() and Suspense:

            import React, { lazy, Suspense } from 'react';
import { BrowserRouter as Router, Route, Switch } from 'react-router-dom';

const HomePage = lazy(() => import('./pages/HomePage'));
const AboutPage = lazy(() => import('./pages/AboutPage'));
const DashboardPage = lazy(() => import('./pages/DashboardPage'));

function App() {
  return (
    <Router>
      <Suspense fallback={<div>Loading page...</div>}>
        <Switch>
          <Route path="/" exact component={HomePage} />
          <Route path="/about" component={AboutPage} />
          <Route path="/dashboard" component={DashboardPage} />
        </Switch>
      </Suspense>
    </Router>
  );
}

export default App;

            

              
                Copy
              
            
          

In this React example, HomePage, AboutPage, and DashboardPage will each be split into their own bundles. The code for a specific page is only fetched when the user navigates to its route.

Vue with Async Components and Vue Router:

            import Vue from 'vue';
import VueRouter from 'vue-router';

Vue.use(VueRouter);

const routes = [
  {
    path: '/',
    name: 'home',
    component: () => import('./views/Home.vue')
  },
  {
    path: '/about',
    name: 'about',
    component: () => import('./views/About.vue')
  },
  {
    path: '/admin',
    name: 'admin',
    component: () => import('./views/Admin.vue')
  }
];

const router = new VueRouter({
  mode: 'history',
  base: process.env.BASE_URL,
  routes
});

export default router;

            

              
                Copy
              
            
          

Here, Vue Router's component definition uses a function that returns import(), effectively lazy-loading the respective view components.

Angular with Lazy-Loaded Modules:

            import { NgModule } from '@angular/core';
import { RouterModule, Routes } from '@angular/router';

const routes: Routes = [
  {
    path: 'home',
    loadChildren: () => import('./home/home.module').then(m => m.HomeModule)
  },
  {
    path: 'products',
    loadChildren: () => import('./products/products.module').then(m => m.ProductsModule)
  },
  {
    path: 'admin',
    loadChildren: () => import('./admin/admin.module').then(m => m.AdminModule)
  },
  { path: '', redirectTo: '/home', pathMatch: 'full' }
];

@NgModule({
  imports: [RouterModule.forRoot(routes)],
  exports: [RouterModule]
})
export class AppRoutingModule { }

            

              
                Copy
              
            
          

Angular leverages loadChildren to specify that an entire module (containing components, services, etc.) should be lazy-loaded when the corresponding route is activated. This is a very robust and structured approach to route-based code splitting.

Advantages of Route-based Code Splitting

• Excellent for Initial Page Load: By only loading the code for the landing page, the initial bundle size is significantly reduced, leading to faster First Contentful Paint (FCP) and Largest Contentful Paint (LCP). This is crucial for user retention, especially for users on slower networks globally.
• Clear, Predictable Split Points: Router configurations provide natural and easy-to-understand boundaries for splitting code. This makes the strategy straightforward to implement and maintain.
• Leverages Router Knowledge: Since the router controls navigation, it can inherently manage the loading of associated code chunks, often with built-in mechanisms for showing loading indicators.
• Improved Cacheability: Smaller, route-specific bundles can be cached independently. If only a small part of the application (e.g., one route's code) changes, users only need to download that specific updated chunk, not the entire application.

Disadvantages of Route-based Code Splitting

• Potential for Larger Route Bundles: If a single route is very complex and comprises many components, dependencies, and business logic, its dedicated bundle can still become quite large. This can negate some of the benefits, especially if that route is a common entry point.
• Doesn't Optimize Within a Single Large Route: This strategy won't help if a user lands on a complex dashboard page and only interacts with a small part of it. The entire dashboard's code might still be loaded, even for elements that are hidden or accessed later via user interaction (e.g., tabs, modals).
• Complex Pre-fetching Strategies: While you can implement pre-fetching (loading code for anticipated routes in the background), making these strategies intelligent (e.g., based on user behavior) can add complexity to your routing logic. Aggressive pre-fetching can also defeat the purpose of code splitting by downloading too much unnecessary code.
• "Waterfall" Loading Effect for Nested Routes: In some cases, if a route itself contains nested, lazily loaded components, you might experience a sequential loading of chunks, which can introduce multiple small delays rather than one larger one.

Component-based Code Splitting: The Granular Approach

Component-based code splitting takes a more granular approach, allowing you to split individual components, UI elements, or even specific functions/modules into their own bundles. This strategy is particularly powerful for optimizing complex views, dashboards, or applications with many conditionally rendered elements where not all parts are visible or interactive at once.

Concept and Mechanism: Splitting Individual Components

Instead of splitting by top-level routes, component-based splitting focuses on smaller, self-contained units of UI or logic. The idea is to defer the loading of components or modules until they are actually rendered, interacted with, or become visible within the current view.

This is achieved by applying dynamic import() to component definitions directly. When the condition for rendering the component is met (e.g., a tab is clicked, a modal is opened, a user scrolls to a specific section), the associated chunk is fetched and rendered.

Implementation Examples

React with React.lazy() for individual components:

            import React, { lazy, Suspense, useState } from 'react';

const ChartComponent = lazy(() => import('./components/ChartComponent'));
const TableComponent = lazy(() => import('./components/TableComponent'));

function Dashboard() {
  const [showCharts, setShowCharts] = useState(false);
  const [showTable, setShowTable] = useState(false);

  return (
    <div>
      <h1>Dashboard Overview</h1>
      <button onClick={() => setShowCharts(!showCharts)}>
        {showCharts ? 'Hide Charts' : 'Show Charts'}
      </button>
      <button onClick={() => setShowTable(!showTable)}>
        {showTable ? 'Hide Table' : 'Show Table'}
      </button>

      <Suspense fallback={<div>Loading charts...</div>}>
        {showCharts && <ChartComponent />}
      </Suspense>

      <Suspense fallback={<div>Loading table...</div>}>
        {showTable && <TableComponent />}
      </Suspense>
    </div>
  );
}

export default Dashboard;

            

              
                Copy
              
            
          

In this React dashboard example, ChartComponent and TableComponent are only loaded when their respective buttons are clicked, or the showCharts/showTable state becomes true. This ensures the initial dashboard load is lighter, deferring heavy components.

Vue with Async Components:

            <template>
  <div>
    <h1>Product Details</h1>
    <button @click="showReviews = !showReviews">
      {{ showReviews ? 'Hide Reviews' : 'Show Reviews' }}
    </button>
    <div v-if="showReviews">
      <Suspense>
        <template #default>
          <ProductReviews />
        </template>
        <template #fallback>
          <div>Loading product reviews...</div>
        </template>
      </Suspense>
    </div>
  </div>
</template>

<script>
import { defineAsyncComponent, ref } from 'vue';

const ProductReviews = defineAsyncComponent(() =>
  import('./components/ProductReviews.vue')
);

export default {
  components: {
    ProductReviews,
  },
  setup() {
    const showReviews = ref(false);
    return { showReviews };
  },
};
</script>

            

              
                Copy
              
            
          

Here, ProductReviews component in Vue 3 (with Suspense for loading state) is only loaded when showReviews is true. Vue 2 uses a slightly different async component definition but the principle is the same.

Angular with Dynamic Component Loading:

Angular's component-based code splitting is more involved as it doesn't have a direct lazy equivalent for components like React/Vue. It typically requires using ViewContainerRef and ComponentFactoryResolver to dynamically load components. While powerful, it's a more manual process than route-based splitting.

            import { Component, ViewChild, ViewContainerRef, ComponentFactoryResolver, OnInit } from '@angular/core';

@Component({
  selector: 'app-dynamic-container',
  template: `
    <button (click)="loadAdminTool()">Load Admin Tool</button>
    <div #container></div>
  `
})
export class DynamicContainerComponent implements OnInit {
  @ViewChild('container', { read: ViewContainerRef }) container!: ViewContainerRef;

  constructor(private resolver: ComponentFactoryResolver) {}

  ngOnInit() {
    // Optionally preload if needed
  }

  async loadAdminTool() {
    this.container.clear();
    const { AdminToolComponent } = await import('./admin-tool/admin-tool.component');
    const factory = this.resolver.resolveComponentFactory(AdminToolComponent);
    this.container.createComponent(factory);
  }
}

            

              
                Copy
              
            
          

This Angular example demonstrates a custom approach to dynamically import and render AdminToolComponent on demand. This pattern offers granular control but demands more boilerplate code.

Advantages of Component-based Code Splitting

• Highly Granular Control: Offers the ability to optimize at a very fine-grained level, down to individual UI elements or specific feature modules. This allows for precise control over what gets loaded and when.
• Optimizes for Conditional UI: Ideal for scenarios where parts of the UI are only visible or active under certain conditions, such as modals, tabs, accordion panels, complex forms with conditional fields, or admin-only features.
• Reduces Initial Bundle Size for Complex Pages: Even if a user lands on a single route, component-based splitting can ensure that only the immediately visible or critical components are loaded, deferring the rest until needed.
• Improved Perceived Performance: By deferring non-critical assets, the user experiences a faster rendering of the primary content, leading to a better perceived performance, even if the total page content is substantial.
• Better Resource Utilization: Prevents downloading and parsing JavaScript for components that might never be seen or interacted with during a user's session.

Disadvantages of Component-based Code Splitting

• Can Introduce More Network Requests: If many components are individually split, it can lead to a large number of smaller network requests. While HTTP/2 and HTTP/3 mitigate some of the overhead, too many requests can still impact performance, especially on high-latency networks.
• More Complex to Manage and Track: Keeping track of all the split points at the component level can become cumbersome in very large applications. Debugging loading issues or ensuring proper fallback UI can be more challenging.
• Potential for "Waterfall" Loading Effect: If several nested components are dynamically loaded sequentially, it can create a waterfall of network requests, delaying the full rendering of a section. Careful planning is needed to group related components or prefetch intelligently.
• Increased Development Overhead: Implementing and maintaining component-level splitting can sometimes require more manual intervention and boilerplate code, depending on the framework and specific use case.
• Over-optimization Risk: Splitting every single component might lead to diminishing returns or even negative performance impact if the overhead of managing many small chunks outweighs the benefits of lazy loading. A balance must be struck.

When to Choose Which Strategy (Or Both)

The choice between route-based and component-based code splitting isn't always an either/or dilemma. Often, the most effective strategy involves a thoughtful combination of both, tailored to the specific needs and architecture of your application.

Decision Matrix: Guiding Your Strategy

• Primary Goal: Improve Initial Page Load Time Significantly?
  • Route-based: Strong choice. Essential for ensuring users get to the first interactive screen quickly.
  • Component-based: Good complement for complex landing pages, but won't solve global route-level loading.
• Application Type: Multi-page like with distinct sections (SPA)?
  • Route-based: Ideal. Each "page" maps cleanly to a distinct bundle.
  • Component-based: Useful for internal optimizations within those pages.
• Application Type: Complex Dashboards / Highly Interactive Views?
  • Route-based: Gets you to the dashboard, but the dashboard itself might still be heavy.
  • Component-based: Crucial. For loading specific widgets, charts, or tabs only when visible/needed.
• Development Effort & Maintainability:
  • Route-based: Generally simpler to set up and maintain, as routes are well-defined boundaries.
  • Component-based: Can be more complex and require careful management of loading states and dependencies.
• Bundle Size Reduction Focus:
  • Route-based: Excellent for reducing the total initial bundle.
  • Component-based: Excellent for reducing the bundle size within a specific view after initial route load.
• Framework Support:
  • Most modern frameworks (React, Vue, Angular) have native or well-supported patterns for both. Angular's component-based requires more manual effort.

Hybrid Approaches: Combining the Best of Both Worlds

For many large-scale, globally accessible applications, a hybrid strategy is the most robust and performant. This typically involves:

1. Route-based splitting for primary navigation: This ensures that a user's initial entry point and subsequent major navigation actions (e.g., from Home to Products) are as fast as possible by loading only the necessary top-level code.
2. Component-based splitting for heavy, conditional UI within routes: Once a user is on a specific route (e.g., a complex data analytics dashboard), component-based splitting defers the loading of individual widgets, charts, or detailed data tables until they are actively viewed or interacted with.

Consider an e-commerce platform: when a user lands on the "Product Details" page (route-based split), the main product image, title, and price load quickly. However, the customer reviews section, a comprehensive technical specifications table, or a "related products" carousel might be loaded only when the user scrolls down to them or clicks a specific tab (component-based split). This provides a fast initial experience while ensuring that potentially heavy, non-critical features don't block the main content.

This layered approach maximizes the benefits of both strategies, leading to a highly optimized and responsive application that caters to diverse user needs and network conditions worldwide.

Advanced concepts like Progressive Hydration and Streaming, often seen with Server-Side Rendering (SSR), further refine this hybrid approach by allowing critical parts of the HTML to become interactive even before all JavaScript is loaded, progressively enhancing the user experience.

Advanced Code Splitting Techniques and Considerations

Beyond the fundamental choice between route-based and component-based strategies, several advanced techniques and considerations can further refine your code splitting implementation for peak global performance.

Preloading and Prefetching: Enhancing User Experience

While lazy loading defers code until needed, intelligent preloading and prefetching can anticipate user behavior and load chunks in the background before they are explicitly requested, making subsequent navigation or interactions instant.

• <link rel="preload">: Tells the browser to download a resource with high priority as soon as possible, but doesn't block rendering. Ideal for critical resources needed very soon after the initial load.
• <link rel="prefetch">: Informs the browser to download a resource at a low priority during idle time. This is perfect for resources that might be needed in the near future (e.g., the next likely route a user will visit). Most bundlers (like Webpack) can integrate prefetching with dynamic imports using magic comments (e.g., import(/* webpackPrefetch: true */ './DetailComponent')).

When applying preloading and prefetching, it's crucial to be strategic. Over-fetching can negate the benefits of code splitting and consume unnecessary bandwidth, especially for users on metered connections. Consider user behavior analytics to identify common navigation paths and prioritize prefetching for those.

Common Chunks and Vendor Bundles: Managing Dependencies

In applications with many split chunks, you might find that multiple chunks share common dependencies (e.g., a large library like Lodash or Moment.js). Bundlers can be configured to extract these shared dependencies into separate "common" or "vendor" bundles.

• optimization.splitChunks in Webpack: This powerful configuration allows you to define rules for how chunks should be grouped. You can configure it to:
  • Create a vendor chunk for all node_modules dependencies.
  • Create a common chunk for modules shared across a minimum number of other chunks.
  • Specify minimum size requirements or maximum number of parallel requests for chunks.

This strategy is vital because it ensures that commonly used libraries are downloaded only once and cached, even if they are dependencies of multiple dynamically loaded components or routes. This reduces the overall amount of code downloaded over a user's session.

Server-Side Rendering (SSR) and Code Splitting

Integrating code splitting with Server-Side Rendering (SSR) presents unique challenges and opportunities. SSR provides a fully rendered HTML page for the initial request, which improves FCP and SEO. However, the client-side JavaScript still needs to "hydrate" this static HTML into an interactive application.

• Challenges: Ensuring that only the JavaScript required for the currently displayed parts of the SSR'd page is loaded for hydration, and that subsequent dynamic imports work seamlessly. If the client tries to hydrate with a missing component's JavaScript, it can lead to hydration mismatches and errors.
• Solutions: Framework-specific solutions (e.g., Next.js, Nuxt.js) often handle this by tracking which dynamic imports were used during SSR and ensuring those specific chunks are included in the initial client-side bundle or prefetched. Manual SSR implementations require careful coordination between server and client to manage which bundles are needed for hydration.

For global applications, SSR combined with code splitting is a potent combination, providing both fast initial content display and efficient subsequent interactivity.

Monitoring and Analytics

Code splitting is not a "set it and forget it" task. Continuous monitoring and analysis are essential to ensure that your optimizations remain effective as your application evolves.

• Bundle Size Tracking: Use tools like Webpack Bundle Analyzer or similar plugins for Rollup/Parcel to visualize your bundle composition. Track bundle sizes over time to detect regressions.
• Performance Metrics: Monitor Core Web Vitals (Largest Contentful Paint, First Input Delay, Cumulative Layout Shift) and other key metrics like Time to Interactive (TTI), First Contentful Paint (FCP), and Total Blocking Time (TBT). Google Lighthouse, PageSpeed Insights, and real user monitoring (RUM) tools are invaluable here.
• A/B Testing: For critical features, A/B test different code splitting strategies to empirically determine which approach yields the best performance and user experience metrics.

The Impact of HTTP/2 and HTTP/3

The evolution of HTTP protocols significantly influences code splitting strategies.

• HTTP/2: With multiplexing, HTTP/2 allows multiple requests and responses to be sent over a single TCP connection, drastically reducing the overhead associated with numerous small files. This makes smaller, more granular code chunks (component-based splitting) more viable than they were under HTTP/1.1, where many requests could lead to head-of-line blocking.
• HTTP/3: Building on HTTP/2, HTTP/3 uses QUIC protocol, which further reduces connection establishment overhead and provides better loss recovery. This makes the overhead of many small files even less of a concern, potentially encouraging even more aggressive component-based splitting strategies.

While these protocols reduce the penalties of multiple requests, it's still crucial to find a balance. Too many tiny chunks can still lead to increased HTTP request overhead and cache inefficiency. The goal is optimized chunking, not merely maximal chunking.

Best Practices for Global Deployments

When deploying code-split applications to a global audience, certain best practices become particularly critical to ensure consistent high performance and reliability.

• Prioritize Critical Path Assets: Ensure that the absolute minimum JavaScript and CSS needed for the initial render and interactivity of your landing page is loaded first. Defer everything else. Use tools like Lighthouse to identify critical path resources.
• Implement Robust Error Handling and Loading States: Dynamically loading chunks means network requests can fail. Implement graceful fallback UIs (e.g., "Failed to load component, please refresh") and clear loading indicators (spinners, skeletons) to provide feedback to users during chunk fetching. This is vital for users on unreliable networks.
• Leverage Content Delivery Networks (CDNs) Strategically: Host your JavaScript chunks on a global CDN. CDNs cache your assets at edge locations geographically closer to your users, drastically reducing latency and download times, especially for dynamically loaded bundles. Configure your CDN to serve JavaScript with appropriate caching headers for optimal performance and cache invalidation.
• Consider Network-Aware Loading: For advanced scenarios, you might adapt your code splitting strategy based on user's detected network conditions. For instance, on slow 2G connections, you might only load absolutely critical components, while on fast Wi-Fi, you might aggressively prefetch more. The Network Information API can be helpful here.
• A/B Test Code Splitting Strategies: Don't assume. Empirically test different code splitting configurations (e.g., more aggressive component splitting vs. fewer, larger chunks) with real users in different geographical regions to identify the optimal balance for your application and audience.
• Continuous Performance Monitoring with RUM: Utilize Real User Monitoring (RUM) tools to gather performance data from actual users across the globe. This provides invaluable insights into how your code splitting strategies are performing under real-world conditions (varying devices, networks, locations) and helps identify performance bottlenecks you might not catch in synthetic tests.

Conclusion: The Art and Science of Optimized Delivery

JavaScript code splitting, whether route-based, component-based, or a powerful hybrid of the two, is an indispensable technique for building modern, high-performance web applications. It's an art that balances the desire for optimal initial load times with the need for rich, interactive user experiences. It's also a science, requiring careful analysis, strategic implementation, and continuous monitoring.

For applications serving a global audience, the stakes are even higher. Thoughtful code splitting directly translates into faster load times, reduced data consumption, and a more inclusive, enjoyable experience for users regardless of their location, device, or network speed. By understanding the nuances of route-based and component-based approaches, and by embracing advanced techniques like preloading, intelligent dependency management, and robust monitoring, developers can craft web experiences that truly transcend geographical and technical barriers.

The journey to a perfectly optimized application is iterative. Start with route-based splitting for a solid foundation, then progressively layer in component-based optimizations where significant performance gains can be achieved. Continuously measure, learn, and adapt your strategy. In doing so, you'll not only deliver faster web applications but also contribute to a more accessible and equitable web for everyone, everywhere.

Happy splitting, and may your bundles be ever so lean!